I credit this to their emphasis on pulling a large number of new features from submitted user ideas. For my work, that means that Studio One can help with a song in so many ways from start to finish, with the editing and mixing of it being the most streamlined and well conceived. There really are a wide variety of features and it makes it very helpful to have at least basic versions of all these different workflows available. I appreciate how many different “styles” of features they have incorporated outside of those core features as well. Like Pro Tools, Cubase, and Logic, Studio One remembers the “Audio Workstation” aspects of “Digital Audio Workstation,” and its mixing workflow and browser behavior has been streamlined very effectively over the years. The maturity of the feature set in editing, mixing, and general studio routing places this in the top class of linear DAWs for me. What keeps me in Studio One is their wide variety of features where it’s convenient and their depth of features where it counts. I am a former Pro Tools and Logic user and while I love those programs as well the feature set here is inclusive enough and the general workflow is cohesive and user-friendly enough that I am happy I am using Studio One. Overall, Studio One helps me compose songs, record them, edit them, and export them and it does it well enough that I’ve never felt the need to go back to any of the other DAWs I’ve used prior.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |